|
|
@@ -312,23 +312,21 @@ stash_add(Prio, ?OP(Action, Topic, Dest, Ctx), Stash) ->
|
|
|
undefined ->
|
|
|
Stash#{Route => {Action, Prio, Ctx}};
|
|
|
RouteOp ->
|
|
|
- case merge_route_op(RouteOp, ?ROUTEOP(Action, Prio, Ctx)) of
|
|
|
- undefined ->
|
|
|
- maps:remove(Route, Stash);
|
|
|
- RouteOpMerged ->
|
|
|
- Stash#{Route := RouteOpMerged}
|
|
|
- end
|
|
|
+ RouteOpMerged = merge_route_op(RouteOp, ?ROUTEOP(Action, Prio, Ctx)),
|
|
|
+ Stash#{Route := RouteOpMerged}
|
|
|
end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
merge_route_op(?ROUTEOP(Action, _Prio1, Ctx1), DestOp = ?ROUTEOP(Action)) ->
|
|
|
%% NOTE: This should not happen anyway.
|
|
|
_ = replyctx_send(ignored, Ctx1),
|
|
|
DestOp;
|
|
|
-merge_route_op(?ROUTEOP(_Action1, _Prio1, Ctx1), ?ROUTEOP(_Action2, _Prio2, Ctx2)) ->
|
|
|
- %% NOTE: Operations cancel each other.
|
|
|
+merge_route_op(?ROUTEOP(_Action1, _Prio1, Ctx1), DestOp = ?ROUTEOP(_Action2, _Prio2, _Ctx2)) ->
|
|
|
+ %% NOTE: Latter cancel the former.
|
|
|
+ %% Strictly speaking, in ideal conditions we could just cancel both, because they
|
|
|
+ %% essentially do not change the global state. However, we decided to stay on the
|
|
|
+ %% safe side and cancel only the former, making batch syncs idempotent.
|
|
|
_ = replyctx_send(ok, Ctx1),
|
|
|
- _ = replyctx_send(ok, Ctx2),
|
|
|
- undefined.
|
|
|
+ DestOp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
%%
|
|
|
|
|
|
@@ -398,13 +396,13 @@ batch_test() ->
|
|
|
[
|
|
|
{2, ignored},
|
|
|
{1, ok},
|
|
|
- {4, ok},
|
|
|
{5, ok},
|
|
|
- {7, ok},
|
|
|
+ {7, ignored},
|
|
|
+ {4, ok},
|
|
|
{9, ok},
|
|
|
- {11, ok},
|
|
|
{8, ok},
|
|
|
- {13, ok}
|
|
|
+ {13, ignored},
|
|
|
+ {11, ok}
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
emqx_utils_stream:consume(emqx_utils_stream:mqueue(0))
|
|
|
).
|